This preprint has been published elsewhere.
Preprint / Version 1

Karl Popper and the problem of demarcation between science and non-science

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27356.85127/1

Keywords:

demarcation problem, Karl Popper, science

Abstract

Karl Popper, as a critical rationalist, was an opponent of all forms of skepticism, conventionalism and relativism in science. Many of his arguments on the issue of demarcation are directed against members of the "Viennese Circle". Popper agreed with them on general aspects of scientific methodology and their distrust of traditional philosophical methodology, but his solutions were significantly different. He contributed significantly to debates on general scientific methodology, the demarcation of science from pseudoscience, the nature of probability, and social science methodology.

Author Biography

Nicolae Sfetcu, Academia Română

Cercetător - Academia Română - Comitetul Român de Istoria și Filosofia Științei și Tehnicii (CRIFST), Divizia de Istoria Științei (DIS)

References

Bunge, Mario. 1982. “Demarcating Science from Pseudoscience.” Fundamenta Scientiae 3. Derksen, A. A. 1993. “The Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science.” Journal for General Philosophy of

Science / Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1): 17–42.

Grayling, A. C. 2001. Wittgenstein: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford.

Hansson, Sven Ove. 2017. “Science and Pseudo-Science.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/pseudo-science/.

Hume, David. 1738. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press. Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. “Structura Revolutiilor Stiintifice.” 1962.

http://www.humanitas.ro/humanitas/structura-revolutiilor-stiintifice-0.

———. 1970. “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?” Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.

Lakatos, I. 1974. “Popper on Demarcation and Induction.” In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, edited by Karl R. Popper and Paul Arthur Schilpp, 1st ed. Vol. The Library of living philosophers. La Salle, Ill: Open Court.

Laudan, Larry. 1983. “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem.” In Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis, 111–27. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7055-7_6.

Lugg, Andrew. 1992. “Pseudoscience as Nonsense.” Methodology and Science 25. Mahner, Martin. 2007. “Demarcating Science from Non-Science.” ResearchGate. 2007.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286895878_Demarcating_Science_from_Non- Science.

Mayo, Deborah G. 1996. “Ducks, Rabbits, and Normal Science: Recasting the Kuhn’s-Eye View of Popper’s Demarcation of Science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2): 271–90. http://www.jstor.org/stable/687948.

Morris, Robert L. 1987. “Parapsychology and the Demarcation Problem.” Inquiry 30 (3): 241–

https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748708602122.

Popper, Karl. 1934. Logica Cercetării.

———. 1963. Conjecturi Și Infirmări.

———. 1985. “Filosofie Socială Şi Filosofia Ştiinţei.” 1985. http://www.edituratrei.ro/carte/karl-r-popper-filosofie-sociala-si-filosofia-stiintei/1085/.

Sfetcu, Nicolae, “Distincția dintre falsificare și respingere în problema demarcației la Karl Popper”, SetThings (3 iunie 2018), MultiMedia (ed.), DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10444.72329, ISBN 978-606-033-139-1, URL = https://www.telework.ro/ro/e-books/distinctia-dintre-falsificare-si-respingere-in-problema-demarcatiei-la-karl-popper/

Siitonen, Arto. 1984. “Demarcation of Science From the Point of View of Problems and Problem-Stating.” Philosophia Naturalis 21: 339–353.

Thornton, Stephen. 2017. “Karl Popper.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/popper/.

Posted

2023-06-22